Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark S. Carroll's avatar

Casandra, thank you for writing the piece I wish Substack would just staple to the top of every leaderboard.

The cleanest takeaway is the one most of us need to hear twice. Leaderboards are a reflection of growth, not a cause of it. Rising is volatile by design, Top Bestseller is basically ARR plus pricing strategy, and New Bestseller is the real milestone because it maps to crossing the first paid threshold.

Also, separating badges from leaderboards is a public service. Too many writers treat a badge like a marketing strategy, when it is really just a counter with a paint job.

My only quibble is the “exact criteria” promise. The framework is solid, but the platform keeps some specifics opaque, so “best available explanation” might be a more accurate label. Still, this is practical, sanity-preserving guidance.

Screenshot the moment, enjoy the confetti, then go publish something worth paying for.

Wyndo's avatar

Love how you break down Substack features in a way that actually makes sense for the rest of us.

I agree — the Rising leaderboard is kind of like a fleeting moment. If you hit it, capture it and share it as social proof for your publication. But don’t make it a goal you obsess over, because it’s a rollercoaster. You’re in one day, out the next.

My take: Rising is more about gamification. You can engineer your way onto it by playing the mechanics right. It rewards short-term spikes.

The Top Bestseller list, on the other hand, is a different game entirely — it reflects gradual, compounding growth in actual revenue (ARR), not vanity metrics. That’s the one worth building toward intentionally.

So treat Rising as a nice moment to capture and leverage — not a KPI.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?